William J. Jones v. Ventura County Sheriff’s Department

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
09-55451
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM J. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
CANTWELL, Deputy; et al.,
Defendants.
No. 09-55451
D.C. No. 2:03-cv-06151-DDP-
AJW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 22, 2010**
Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
FILED
OCT 07 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-55451 2
We do not consider the district court’s disposition of William J. Jones’s
claims because he identifies no error that he contends the district court committed
and presents no argument challenging any of its rulings. See Acosta-Huerta v.
Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues raised in pro se litigant’s brief but
not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --