Kathy Grismore v. Rjm Acquisitions LLC

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28**
U.S.C. § 636(c).
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision***
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s
request for oral argument is denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KATHY GRISMORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RJM ACQUISITIONS LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 09-15867
D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00529-DKD
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David K. Duncan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted September 13, 2010***
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Kathy Grismore appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment
in her action alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the
FILED
OCT 06 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-15867 2
Fair Credit Reporting Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo. Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc., 592 F.3d 1027, 1030 (9th Cir.
2010). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record, N. Mariana Islands
v. United States, 399 F.3d 1057, 1060 (9th Cir. 2005), and we affirm.
Summary judgment was properly granted for defendant because Grismore
failed to raise a triable issue as to whether, among other things, defendant (1) made
any false statements in connection with its attempts to collect the debt; (2) reported
false information to the credit reporting agencies; or (3) continued its collection
activity before verifying the debt after Grismore disputed it. See 15 U.S.C.
§§ 1692e, 1692f, 1692g, 1681s-2(b); Donohue, 592 F.3d at 1033-34 (false
statements that are immaterial are not actionable under sections 1692e or 1692f).
Grismore’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --