Cecilia Sarai Guzman Gonzalez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CECILIA SARAI GUZMAN
GONZALEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-73185
Agency No. A079-525-633
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Cecilia Sarai Guzman Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her
motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the
petition for review.
FILED
SEP 29 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-73185 2
In her opening brief, Guzman Gonzalez fails to address, and thereby has
waived any challenge to, the BIA’s dispositive determination that she failed to
establish the due diligence necessary to waive the 90-day filing deadline for
motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2); Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d
1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised in an opening brief are
deemed waived).
In light of our disposition, we do not reach Guzman Gonzalez’s remaining
contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --