United States of America v. Steed Bert Youvella

09-10238Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSep 27, 2010

Full text

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEED BERT YOUVELLA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-10238
D.C. No. 3:08-cr-01205-PGR
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Steed Bert Youvella appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following
his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation
of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we dismiss.
FILED
SEP 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-10238 2
Youvella contends the district court abused its discretion by imposing
special conditions of supervised release requiring sex offender treatment. The
valid and enforceable appeal waiver precludes our review of this contention.
See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 981-88 (9th Cir. 2009); see also
United States v. Joyce, 357 F.3d 921, 924 (9th Cir. 2004) (where defendant waives
right as conferred by 18 U.S.C. § 3742 to appeal sentence, that waiver includes
right to appeal all forms of punishment listed in that statute, including any term of
imprisonment, fines, and conditions of supervised release).
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.