Horacio Renteria-Nambo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HORACIO RENTERIA-NAMBO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74400
Agency No. A020-098-079
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Horacio Renteria-Nambo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence
FILED
SEP 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74400 2
the agency’s continuous physical presence determination, Canales-Vargas v.
Gonzales, 441 F.3d 739, 742 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for review.
The record does not compel the conclusion that Renteria-Nambo met his
burden of establishing continuous physical presence from May 1996 to May 2006.
See Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir. 1999) (a contrary result is
not compelled where there is “[t]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent
conclusions from the evidence”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --