Isabel Cristina Marmolejo- Hernandez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

08-71790Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSep 27, 2010

Full text

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ISABEL CRISTINA MARMOLEJO-
HERNANDEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-71790
Agency No. A095-685-451
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Isabel Cristina Marmolejo-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order
dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We
dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
SEP 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-71790 2
We lack jurisdiction to consider Marmolejo-Hernandez’s contention that the
IJ erred and violated due process by not granting a continuance because she failed
to raise this contention to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th
Cir. 2004) (generally requiring exhaustion of claims before the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.