Tomasa Negrete De Aldaco v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TOMASA NEGRETE DE ALDACO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 05-75232
Agency No. A034-602-755
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Tomasa Negrete De Aldaco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) deportation order. Our jurisdiction is governed by
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
SEP 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

05-75232 2
We lack jurisdiction to consider Negrete De Aldaco’s contentions that the IJ
violated her due process rights in denying her request for relief under former
section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed 1996), because she failed to exhaust
them before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004)
(generally requiring exhaustion of claims before the agency).
We also lack jurisdiction to review Negrete De Alco’s contentions
challenging the discretionary denial of her request for section 212(c) relief. See
8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Palma-Rojas v. INS, 244 F.3d 1191, 1192 (9th Cir.
2001) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --