Leoncio Reyes-Rivas v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEONCIO REYES-RIVAS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-71624
Agency No. A072-531-554
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Leoncio Reyes-Rivas, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration
judge’s decision denying his application for voluntary departure as a matter of
FILED
SEP 24 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-71624 2
discretion. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition
for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Reyes-Rivas
did not merit voluntary departure as a matter of discretion. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f)
(“No court shall have jurisdiction over an appeal from denial of a request for an
order of voluntary departure”); Gomez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 393 F.3d 882, 884 (9th
Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --