Jose R. Beltran v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

08-71554Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSep 24, 2010

Full text

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE R. BELTRAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-71554
Agency No. A073-981-758
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Jose R. Beltran, a native and citizen fo Mexico, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
FILED
SEP 24 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-71554 2
judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss
the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
Beltran failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying
relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
Beltran’s contention that the agency failed to consider relevant hardship factors is
not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable claim over which
we have jurisdiction. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir.
2009).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.