Domingo German Macavilca- Parco v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DOMINGO GERMAN MACAVILCA-
PARCO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-71179
Agency No. A093-100-565
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Domingo German Macavilca-Parco, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions
pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
SEP 22 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-71179 2
We lack jurisdiction to review Macavilca-Parco’s ineffective assistance of
counsel claim because he failed to raise that issue before the BIA and thereby
failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d
674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to review
contentions not raised before the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --