Gloria Hernandez Martinez v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GLORIA HERNANDEZ MARTINEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 06-71010
Agency No. A079-544-164
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010 **
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Gloria Hernandez Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision summarily affirming the
FILED
SEP 21 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

06-71010 2
immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal based on
her failure to establish the requisite hardship to her qualifying relatives.
Hernandez Martinez contends that the agency erred in finding that her
qualifying relatives will not suffer hardship if she is removed. We lack jurisdiction
to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioner failed to show
exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Martinez-
Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --