Anthony Andre Sharp v. Joseph A. Bick

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY ANDRE SHARP,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH A. BICK,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 08-16648
D.C. No. 2:08-CV-00443-GEB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 10, 2010**
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Anthony Andre Sharp appeals pro se the dismissal of his petition for
removal of a California state court action to federal court. We have jurisdiction
FILED
SEP 01 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

For the reasons stated in the district court’s July 15, 2008, order, a1
certificate of appealability is unnecessary in this case.
2
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.1
Sharp contends the district court erred by denying his petition for removal
because the state court and state officials are violating his constitutional rights. We
affirm the district court’s conclusion that, as the plaintiff in the underlying state
court action, Sharp cannot remove the case to federal court. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1446(a); see also American Int’l Underwriters, (Philippines), Inc. v. Continental
Ins. Co., 843 F.2d 1253, 1260 (9th Cir. 1988) (“The right to remove a state court
case to federal court is clearly limited to defendants.”).
All pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --