The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-50173•United States of America v. Richard Lee Hellman
09-50173Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 4, 2010
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, Senior United States District Judge
for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD LEE HELLMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 09-50173
D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00754-RMT-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Robert M. Takasugi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 2, 2010 **
Pasadena, California
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, Circuit Judge and
WHYTE, District Judge. ***
FILED
AUG 04 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
page 2
The government failed to object below and hasn’t shown a “reasonable
probability that [Hellman] would have received a different sentence but for the
district court’s error.” United States v. Gonzalez-Zotelo, 556 F.3d 736, 741 (9th
Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.