Carl Wayne Cavalli v. ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, Warden

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARL WAYNE CAVALLI,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 08-16611
D.C. No. 2:06-cv-01700-ALA
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Arthur L. Alarcón, Circuit Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 29, 2010**
Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Carl Wayne Cavalli appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28
FILED
JUL 21 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

We certify for appeal the issue of whether the state court unreasonably1
determined that the Governor’s 2005 decision deny parole was supported by some
evidence. We decline to certify any other issues raised by Cavalli.
08-16611 2
U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm.1
Appellee’s motions to dismiss the appeal and strike various documents are
denied.
Cavalli contends that the Governor’s 2005 decision to deny him parole was
not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights.
The state court did not unreasonably determine that some evidence supports the
Governor’s decision. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Hayward v. Marshall, 603
F.3d 546, 563 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --