Aureliano Hilario-Ambrosio v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AURELIANO HILARIO-AMBROSIO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-70743
Agency No. A098-382-881
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 29, 2010**
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Aureliano Hilario-Ambrosio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his request for administrative
closure. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
FILED
JUL 16 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-70743 2
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of Hilario-Ambrosio’s
request for administrative closure. See Diaz-Covarrubias v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d
1114, 1117-20 (9th Cir. 2009).
In his opening brief, Hilario-Ambrosio fails to address, and therefore has
waived any challenge to, the BIA’s determination that the IJ did not err in denying
his request for a continuance. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60
(9th Cir. 1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --