The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-70055•Emilia Hernandez De Quevedo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
08-70055Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJul 13, 2010
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EMILIA HERNANDEZ DE QUEVEDO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-70055
Agency No. A029-253-553
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 29, 2010**
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Emilia Hernandez De Quevedo, a native of El Salvador and a citizen of El
Salvador and Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision
FILED
JUL 13 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
08-70055 2
denying her application for relief under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central
American Relief Act of 1997 (“NACARA”). We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Hernandez
De Quevedo failed to establish eligibility for relief under NACARA. See
NACARA, Pub. L. No. 105-100, § 203(a)(1), 111 Stat. 2160, 2196-97 (Nov. 19,
1997); see also Lanuza v. Holder, 597 F.3d 970, 972 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.