The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-16391•David Webb v. Joanne Sumie Onizuka;
09-16391Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 17, 2010
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID WEBB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOANNE SUMIE ONIZUKA; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 09-16391
D.C. No. 1:08-cv-00487-DAE-
LEK
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Hawaii
David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
David Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
action arising from his purchase of a used vehicle. We have jurisdiction under 28
FILED
JUN 17 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
09-16391 2
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Peralta v. Hispanic Bus., Inc., 419 F.3d 1064,
1068 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm the dismissal of each defendant because the
district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.