Muhammad Parvez v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MUHAMMAD PARVEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-70161
Agency No. A046-988-737
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Muhammad Parvez, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order finding Parvez removable and denying his
FILED
JUN 08 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-70161 2
application under 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4)(B) for waiver of the joint-filing
requirement to remove the conditional basis of his lawful permanent resident
status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial
evidence the agency’s denial of the waiver, Oropeza-Wong v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d
1135, 1147 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The IJ found Parvez not credible based on inconsistencies between Parvez
and his ex-wife’s testimony regarding the nature and number of their marriage
ceremonies and the consummation of their marriage. Because these
inconsistencies go to the heart of whether the marriage was entered into in good
faith, substantial evidence supports the denial of Parvez’s waiver application. See
id. at 1148.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --