The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-75120•Eliseo Benjamin De Leon- Maldonado v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General
07-75120Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 7, 2010
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ELISEO BENJAMIN DE LEON-
MALDONADO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-75120
Agency No. A072-172-513
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010 **
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Eliseo Benjamin De Leon-Maldonado, a native and citizen of Guatemala,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his
appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial
FILED
JUN 07 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
07-75120 2
evidence, Lim v. INS, 224 F.3d 929, 933 (9th Cir. 2000), and we deny the petition
for review.
De Leon-Maldonado testified that he was not detained, physically harmed,
or directly threatened by the guerillas. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s
determination that he did not establish past persecution based on his membership
in a civil defense patrol. See id. at 936. Substantial evidence also supports the
agency’s determination that De Leon-Maldonado failed to establish a well-founded
fear of future persecution in light of changed country conditions following the
1996 peace accords, see Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 997-98
(9th Cir. 2003), and because De Leon-Maldonado’s similarly-situated father
remains in Guatemala unharmed, see Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.
2001).
Accordingly, De Leon-Maldonado’s asylum claim fails.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.