Full text
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHIU HUNG WONG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74173
Agency No. A035-341-477
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Chiu Hung Wong, a native and citizen of Hong Kong, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8
FILED
JUN 01 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
07-74173 2
U.S.C. § 1252. The government’s renewed motion to remand this petition for
review to the BIA is granted over Wong’s opposition.
We therefore do not reach the merits of Wong’s petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW REMANDED.
-- 2 of 2 --
