Gurjeet Singh v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GURJEET SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74684
Agency No. A075-314-539
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 5, 2010**
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Gurjeet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board
of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his third motion to reopen
removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny
FILED
APR 14 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-74684 2
the petition for review.
In his opening brief, Singh fails to address, and therefore has waived any
challenge to, the BIA’s determinations that the motion to reopen failed to qualify
for an exception to the regulatory time and numerical filing limitations, and failed
to establish grounds for equitable tolling. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d
1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding issues which are not specifically raised and
argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --