Maria Murillo Ceballos v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA MURILLO CEBALLOS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74307
Agency No. A093-368-460
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 5, 2010**
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Maria Murillo Ceballos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of
FILED
APR 12 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-74307 2
removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
substantial evidence factual findings of the IJ. Ramos v. INS, 246 F.3d 1264, 1266
(9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Murillo Ceballos
provided false testimony for the purpose of obtaining an immigration benefit,
thereby rendering her unable to establish the requisite good moral character for
cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(f)(6), 1229b(b)(1)(B); see also
Ramos, 246 F.3d at 1266.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --