MARIA ISABEL SANJUR; MARIA ISABEL SANJUR, Jr. v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NHY/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA ISABEL SANJUR; MARIA
ISABEL SANJUR, Jr.,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-71133
Agency Nos. A029-494-298
A029-494-301
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 16, 2010**
Before: PREGERSON, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Maria Isabel Sanjur and her daughter, Maria Isabel Sanjur, natives and
citizens of Panama, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8
FILED
MAR 31 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

NHY/Research 07-71133 2
U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen
and review de novo due process claims due to ineffective assistance of counsel.
Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the
petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to
reopen where Petitioners lacked “plausible grounds for relief.” See Rojas-Garcia
v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003).
Petitioners’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --