United States of America v. JUAN SANABRIA-PEREZ, AKA Maximino Hernandez-Vega

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
SR/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN SANABRIA-PEREZ, AKA
Maximino Hernandez-Vega,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 08-10520
D.C. No. 2:07-cr-01273-FJM
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010**
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Juan Sanabria-Perez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 65-month
sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to
FILED
APR 01 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

SR/Research 08-10520 2
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sanabria-Perez’s counsel has filed a
brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a
pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --