Andre Brigham Young v. State of Washington;

08-35640Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 30, 2010

Full text

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JK/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDRE BRIGHAM YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-35640
D.C. No. 2:06-cv-01687-JCC
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010**
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Andre Brigham Young, a former Washington state prisoner and current civil
detainee, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
FILED
MAR 30 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

JK/Research 08-35640 2
§ 1983 action as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Whitaker v. Garcetti,
486 F.3d 572, 579 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
The district court properly dismissed the action as Heck-barred because a
judgment in Young’s favor would necessarily imply the invalidity of his
conviction, and Young failed to allege that his conviction has been invalidated.
See Heck, 512 U.S. at 486-87; Huftile v. Miccio-Fonseca, 410 F.3d 1136, 1139-40
(9th Cir. 2005) (applying Heck to civil detainees). However, we vacate the
judgment to the extent that it dismissed the action with prejudice, and remand for
entry of dismissal without prejudice. See Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa, 49 F.3d
583, 585 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (stating that dismissals under Heck are
without prejudice).
We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Smith
v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).
The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.
AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.