United States of America v. Charles Moore

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NC/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES MOORE,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-10241
D.C. No. 2:98-CR-00025-PMP
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010**
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Charles Moore appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for
a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
MAR 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

NC/Research 09-10241 2
Moore contends that the district court erred by failing to reduce his sentence
pursuant to Amendment 706 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. This
contention fails because Moore was sentenced as a career offender pursuant to
U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. See United States v. Wesson, 583 F.3d 728, 731-32 (9th Cir.
2009).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --