Ravinder Singh v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JT/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAVINDER SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74075
Agency No. A070-551-134
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Ravinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion
FILED
FEB 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

JT/Research 07-74075 2
the denial of a motion to reopen. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.
2008). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in construing Singh’s third motion to
reopen as seeking reopening of its January 26, 2005, order, and denying the motion
as untimely filed and number-barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c).
Singh’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --