Ramiro Hernandez-Beltran v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
AP/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAMIRO HERNANDEZ-BELTRAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-72651
Agency No. A075-715-266
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Ramiro Hernandez-Beltran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
FILED
FEB 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

AP/Research 07-72651 2
§ 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968,
972 (9th Cir. 2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2005), we deny the
petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez-Beltran’s motion
as untimely where the motion was filed more than 18 months after the BIA’s final
administrative order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --