Cruz Leticia Gomez-Sosa v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
KS/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CRUZ LETICIA GOMEZ-SOSA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74059
Agency No. A096-188-741
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Cruz Leticia Gomez-Sosa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of
FILED
FEB 24 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

KS/Research 07-74059 2
removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo
questions of law, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir. 2003),
and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
Gomez-Sosa failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. See
Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
Contrary to Gomez-Sosa’s contention, the proceedings were not “so
fundamentally unfair that [she] was prevented from reasonably presenting [her]
case.” Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000) (citation omitted).
Gomez-Sosa’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --