Manolito Dilag v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
LR/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MANOLITO DILAG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74147
Agency No. A042-825-432
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Manolito Dilag, native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision deeming his cancellation of removal
FILED
FEB 23 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

LR/Research 07-74147 2
application waived. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
de novo questions of law. Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir.
2005). We deny the petition for review.
The agency properly determined that Dilag waived his application for
cancellation of removal where he failed to file it within the time limit set by the IJ.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31(c) (authorizing the IJ to set filing deadlines and to deem
waived any application not filed by the deadline).
Dilag’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --