Rosa Buenrostro v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JT/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROSA BUENROSTRO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-75305
Agency No. A095-451-051
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 11, 2010**
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Rosa Buenrostro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to
reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
FILED
JAN 20 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

JT/Research 06-75305 2
discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960,
964 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Buenrostro’s motion to
reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the
BIA’s May 24, 2006, order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --