Francisco Rebolledo-Adan v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JT/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANCISCO REBOLLEDO-ADAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-70391
Agency No. A070-728-191
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 15, 2009**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Francisco Rebolledo-Adan, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to
reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
FILED
DEC 30 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

JT/Research 06-70391 2
discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Morales Apolinar v. Mukasey, 514
F.3d 893, 895 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rebolledo-Adan’s motion to
reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the
BIA’s October 6, 2005, order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --