Billa Singh, aka Makhan Singh v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NHY/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BILLA SINGH, aka Makhan Singh,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 05-73743
Agency Nos. A073-419-361
A072-475-044
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Immigration Court
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Billa Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) exclusion order. We dismiss the petition for lack of
jurisdiction.
FILED
DEC 14 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

NHY/Research 05-73743 2
We lack jurisdiction over Singh’s contentions that the IJ’s November 29,
1994, exclusion order is not valid because Singh failed to exhaust his
administrative remedies. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Puga v. Chertoff, 488 F.3d
812, 815 (9th Cir. 2007).
To the extent Singh is challenging the government’s decision to execute the
exclusion order, we lack jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g).
In light of our disposition, Singh’s motion to supplement the record is moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --