The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-56020•Kevin Vanginderen v. Cornell University
08-56020Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 10, 2009
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9TH CIR. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KEVIN VANGINDEREN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORNELL UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
KEVIN VANGINDEREN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORNELL UNIVERSITY; BERT
DEIXLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-56020
D.C. No. 3:07-cv-02045-BTM-
JMA
No. 09-55053
D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00736-BTM-
JMA
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding
FILED
DEC 10 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
The Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge**
for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
-2-
Argued and Submitted November 6, 2009
Pasadena, California
Before: BRIGHT, BYBEE, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.**
In this appeal, Kevin Vanginderen claims errors of law, fact, and in the
admission of evidence. We have carefully examined these claims of error and
determine that the rulings of the district court did not prejudice Vanginderen.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM. No costs are allowed on appeal.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.