Daihui Chen v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
AR/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAIHUI CHEN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-73421
Agency No. A096-356-347
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Daihui Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board
of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal,
FILED
DEC 09 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

AR/Research 06-73421 2
and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Our jurisdiction is governed
by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review Chen’s challenge to the adverse credibility
determination because Chen failed to exhaust the challenge before the BIA. See
8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930 (9th Cir. 2004) (“A
petitioner cannot satisfy the exhaustion requirement by making a general challenge
to the IJ’s decision, but, rather, must specify which issues form the basis of the
appeal.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --