Lizardi Magali Estrada v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

04-76531Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 9, 2009

Full text

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
AP/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LIZARDI MAGALI ESTRADA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
Nos. 04-76531
05-72613
Agency No. A077-974-853
MEMORANDUM *
On Petitions for Review of Orders of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Lizardi Magali Estrada, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing her appeal
from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of
FILED
DEC 09 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

AP/Research 04-76531 2
removal and, upon reconsideration, again dismissing her appeal. As the BIA
granted Estrada’s motion to reconsider, we dismiss the petition for review in No.
04-76531. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) (jurisdiction over final orders of removal).
We have jurisdiction in petition No. 05-72613 under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
de novo questions of law, Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 390 F.3d 649, 651 (9th
Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA properly concluded that Estrada is statutorily ineligible for
cancellation of removal based on her conviction for a crime of domestic violence.
See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b)(1)(C); 1227(a)(2)(E)(i); see also Gonzalez-Gonzalez,
390 F.3d at 651-53. Estrada’s contention that she is eligible for cancellation
because her conviction is not a crime involving moral turpitude is inapposite.
Moreover, her contention that the petty offense exception applies in her case is
unavailing. See Cisernos-Perez v. Gonzales, 465 F.3d 386, 390 (9th Cir. 2006)
(petty offense exception does not apply to crimes of domestic violence).
No. 04-76531: PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
No. 05-72613: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.