Fernando Medina-Larios v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JTK/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FERNANDO MEDINA-LARIOS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 05-71408
Agency No. A070-784-065
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Fernando Medina-Larios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.
FILED
DEC 07 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

JTK/Research 05-71408 2
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of
law, Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the
petition for review.
Medina-Larios’ contention that his convictions do not render him ineligible
for cancellation of removal because they occurred over ten years prior to his
application is foreclosed by Flores-Juarez v. Mukasey, 530 F.3d 1020, 1022 (9th
Cir. 2008) (“[Section] 1229b(b)(1)(C) . . . does not place any temporal limitation
on when the crime was committed.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --