Anahit Hovhanisyan v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NED/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANAHIT HOVHANISYAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-71518
Agency No. A095-183-894
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Anahit Hovhanisyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of
FILED
NOV 30 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

NED/Research 07-71518 2
removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our
jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an
adverse credibility determination, Gui v. INS, 280 F.3d 1217, 1225 (9th Cir. 2002),
and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination
because Hovhanisyan’s asylum application was materially inconsistent with her
testimony concerning the identity and motive of her attackers, Hovhanisyan failed
to provide a reasonable explanation for these inconsistencies, and the
inconsistencies goes to the heart of her claim. See Ceballos-Castillo v. INS, 904
F.2d 519, 520 (9th Cir. 1990). In the absence of credible testimony,
Hovhanisyan’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v.
Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).
We lack jurisdiction to review Hovhanisyan’s CAT claim because she failed
to raise it to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --