Peter Allan, Sr. v. Dennis Benson

12-1041Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2013

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-2783
___________________________
Peter Allan, Sr.
lllllllllllllllllllll Appellant
v.
Dennis Benson; Scott Sutton; Sharon Barney; Dan Hilleren; Joan Fabian; Joel
Korby; Mary Lind Schafer; Sue Creager; Alan Eckert, sued in their individual and
official capacities
lllllllllllllllllllll Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: February 7, 2013
Filed: February 8, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM.
Peter Allan, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ.1
P. 60(b) motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We find no abuse of discretion in the
denial of Rule 60(b) relief, see Swope v. Siegel-Robert, Inc., 243 F.3d 486, 498 (8th
Cir. 2001) (district court has broad discretion over whether to grant hearing or make
specific findings on Rule 60(b) motion; Rule 60(b) determination will not be
overturned absent existence of exceptional circumstances); and we find no merit to
Mr. Allan’s other arguments for reversal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the1
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.