Steve Wayne Postier v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-1801
___________________________
Steve Wayne Postier
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: January 3, 2013
Filed: February 7, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Steve Postier appeals from an order of the District Court order affirming the1
partially favorable decision of the Social Security Commissioner. After a hearing at
which Postier and a vocational expert testified, the administrative law judge (ALJ)
found that Postier was disabled as of October 10, 2008, when he turned 55 years old,
but that he was not disabled before then. Following careful review, we conclude that
the ALJ properly discounted the opinion of Postier’s treating physician, see Howe v.
Astrue, 499 F.3d 835, 840–41 (8th Cir. 2007); that deference to the ALJ’s credibility
findings is warranted because they are supported by good reasons and substantial
evidence, see Pelkey v. Barnhart, 433 F.3d 575, 578 (8th Cir. 2006); and that the
ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, see
Perkins v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 892, 897 (8th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the District Court.
______________________________
The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District1
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Tony N.
Leung, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --