James Marcum v. Retirement Plan for Hourly-Rated Employees of Noranda Aluminum, Inc.

11-3369Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2013

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-2547
___________________________
James Marcum
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Retirement Plan for Hourly-Rated Employees of Noranda Aluminum, Inc.;
Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: January 18, 2013
Filed: January 31, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

James Marcum appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment1
in his Employment Retirement Income Security Act lawsuit arising from the denial
of early retirement disability benefits. Upon de novo review, see Green v. Union Sec.
Ins. Co., 646 F.3d 1042, 1050 (8th Cir. 2011), we find no basis for overturning the
district court’s well-reasoned determination that the adverse decision on Marcum’s
benefits application did not amount to an abuse of discretion, see id. (affirmance is
warranted if the decision is reasonable, i.e., reasonable person could have reached
similar decision, given evidence before plan administrator when decision was made).
The district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Missouri.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.