The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-3345•Christine M. Lockette v. Dr. Miracle LLC; Solo Laboratories Inc.; King Beauty Distributor Corporation
11-3345Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-2123
___________________________
Christine M. Lockette
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Dr. Miracle LLC; Solo Laboratories Inc.; King Beauty Distributor Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
Sarah Cho
lllllllllllllllllllllMovant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: October 5, 2012
Filed: October 11, 2012
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Christine Lockette appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint1
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon careful de novo review, see Knutson v.
City of Fargo, 600 F.3d 992, 995 (8th Cir. 2010) (dismissal for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction reviewed de novo), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the1
Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.