The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-3345•Harol R. Beisel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
11-3345Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-2029
___________________________
Harol R. Beisel
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: October 5, 2012
Filed: October 11, 2012
____________
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Harol Beisel appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil complaint. Upon1
our careful de novo review, see McAdams v. McCord, 584 F.3d 1111, 1113 (8th Cir.
The Honorable Erin Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western1
District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.