Thomas M. Smalley v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

11-3345Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2012

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-1711
___________________________
Thomas M. Smalley
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: October 5, 2012
Filed: October 15, 2012
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Thomas M. Smalley appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of
disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review,
see Perks v. Astrue, 687 F.3d 1086, 1091 (8th Cir. 2012), we agree with the district
court that the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) decision is supported by substantial
evidence on the record as a whole. Specifically, we find that the ALJ’s adverse
credibility determination is entitled to deference, see Finch v. Astrue, 547 F.3d 933,
935-36 (8th Cir. 2008) (credibility findings are for ALJ in first instance, and when
ALJ explicitly discredits claimant and gives good reasons for doing so, her judgment
is entitled to deference); that reversal is not warranted based on the ALJ’s alleged
failure to develop the record on residual functional capacity, cf. Ellis v. Barnhart, 392
F.3d 988, 994 (8th Cir. 2005) (reversing for failure to develop record is warranted
when such failure is prejudicial or unfair); and that Smalley has offered no basis for
remanding under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), see Krogmeier v. Barnhart, 294
F.3d 1019, 1024-25 (8th Cir. 2002) (discussing requirements). The district court is
affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable James E. Gritzner, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.