The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-3607•United States v. Phillip Brumfield
10-3607Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 12-1037
___________
Fred Moore, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
USA 800, in its official capacity; Tom *
Davis, in his official and individual * [UNPUBLISHED]
capacity; Dan Lake, in his official *
and individual capacity; Tracy *
Hatfield, in her official and individual *
capacity, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 3, 2012
Filed: July 11, 2012
___________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Fred Moore filed a notice of appeal designating various interlocutory district
court orders in his pending employment discrimination action. However, the notice1
The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western1
District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
of appeal is untimely as to most of the orders, Moore is not appealing from a final
order as required for jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we can find no basis
upon which to entertain an interlocutory appeal. See Kassuelke v. Alliant Techsys.,
Inc., 223 F.3d 929, 930-31 (8th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for
lack of jurisdiction.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.