The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-3607•United States v. Phillip Brumfield
10-3607Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 12-1026
___________
Kent Thorsheim, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Southern
* District of Iowa.
State of Iowa; Polk County Iowa; City *
of Des Moines; Keri Jobe; Cindy * [UNPUBLISHED]
Miller; Janis Lavorato; Julie Burger; *
Roger J. Kuhle; Mark Godwin; *
John Paul Roehrick, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: June 21, 2012
Filed: July 2, 2012
___________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Kent Thorsheim appeals the district court’s1
dismissal of his complaint. Upon careful de novo review, see Reynolds v. Dormire,
The Honorable James E. Gritzner, Chief Judge, United States District Court1
for the Southern District of Iowa, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Celeste F. Bremer, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
636 F.3d 976, 979 (8th Cir. 2011) (dismissal for failure to state claim reviewed de
novo); Knutson v. City of Fargo, 600 F.3d 992, 995 (8th Cir. 2010) (dismissal for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction reviewed de novo), we find no basis for reversal.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.