The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-2606•Brian Ridenour v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.
11-2606Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2544
___________
Anvarjon Zakirov; Fazilatkhon *
Kasimova; Abrorjon Akhmadjonov, *
*
Petitioners, *
* Petition for Review of an
v. * Order of the
* Board of Immigration Appeals.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General *
of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: May 1, 2012
Filed: May 4, 2012
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Uzbekistan citizens Anvarjon Zakirov, his wife Fazilatkhon Kasimova, and
their son Abrorjon Akhmadjonov petition for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their motion to reconsider an earlier decision.
After careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying
petitioners’ motion. See Kipkemboi v. Holder, 587 F.3d 885, 890-91 (8th Cir. 2009)
(standard of review). In addition, we find no merit to petitioners’ due process
argument. See Banat v. Holder, 557 F.3d 886, 893 (8th Cir. 2009) (applicant must
-- 1 of 2 --
show that alleged due process error was prejudicial or had potential for affecting
outcome). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.