The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-3600•Terry Harrington v. City of Council Bluffs
10-3600Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-3795
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Southern
v. * District of Iowa.
*
Kent Eugene Walker, Sr., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 20, 2012
Filed: April 24, 2012
___________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, Kent Walker challenges the reasonableness of the
sentence that the district court imposed upon revoking his supervised release.1
Having carefully reviewed the record, see United States v. Growden, 663 F.3d 982,
984 (8th Cir. 2011), we conclude that the revocation sentence of 8 months in prison,
which was within the advisory Guidelines range and below the statutory maximum,
followed by 6 months of supervised release, which was also authorized by statute,
The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern1
District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
was not unreasonable, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), (h); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B);
United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm
the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.