The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-3600•Terry Harrington v. City of Council Bluffs
10-3600Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-3542
___________
James A. Widtfeldt *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* Tax Court.
v. *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 25, 2012
Filed: April 30, 2012
___________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
James Widtfeldt appeals from a decision of the Tax Court dismissing his1
petition for lack of jurisdiction. Following careful de novo review, see Bartman v.
Comm’r, 446 F.3d 785, 787 (8th Cir. 2006) (noting that appellate court reviews
de novo tax court’s conclusion of law, including determination regarding its
jurisdiction), we conclude that the dismissal was appropriate for the reasons discussed
by the Tax Court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the
pending motions.
______________________________
The Honorable John O. Colvin, Chief Judge, United States Tax Court.1
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.