The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-2131•United States v. William Mefford
10-2131Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 30, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2014
___________
Steven R. Blair, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Nebraska.
*
City of Omaha, et al., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees, *
*
___________
Submitted: February 15, 2012
Filed: March 22, 2012
___________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Steven Blair appeals the district court’s dismissal of two private individuals,1
Patty Dory and Lori Anzaldo, who were named as defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action. After careful review, we conclude that the claims in question are precluded2
The HONORABLE JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, United States District Judge1
for the District of Nebraska.
Dory and Anzaldo were incorrectly identified in the case caption as district2
court judges. We previously summarily affirmed the dismissal of two other
defendants, and Blair waived his claims against the remaining appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
by the doctrine of res judicata, as these defendants were dismissed with prejudice in
a prior action brought by Blair. Blair v. Anderson, D. Neb. No. 4:04-cv-03229, R.
Docs. No. 42, 57. Accordingly, we affirm, and we deny all pending motions.
_________________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.